NEAR up 4.48% this week: a push to 5.293 USDT, then a drop to 4.462 USDT

NEAR closed the week at 5.133 USDT, up 4.48%, but the path was not smooth: it pushed to 5.293 USDT on October 5 and then dropped to 4.462 USDT on October 8, a single-day fall of 16.33%. Quantum-resistant signature talk keeps coming up, but the price tells a more complicated story — this week ranks 71st out of a 200-week sample, in the first half of the sample.

What actually happened this week

Here are the daily candles, so the week is not remembered only by its start and end.

Date	Open	Close	Change
2026-10-03	4.69 USDT	4.832 USDT	3.03%
2026-10-04	4.832 USDT	4.914 USDT	1.7%
2026-10-05	4.913 USDT	5.293 USDT	7.73%
2026-10-06	5.293 USDT	5.064 USDT	-4.33%
2026-10-07	5.064 USDT	5.334 USDT	5.33%
2026-10-08	5.333 USDT	4.462 USDT	-16.33%
2026-10-09	4.462 USDT	4.883 USDT	9.44%
2026-10-10	4.882 USDT	5.133 USDT	5.14%

Three days are enough. October 5 lifted price from 4.913 USDT to 5.293 USDT, up 7.73%, and looked like the quantum-resistant narrative was being bought. October 8 reversed it: open 5.333 USDT, close 4.462 USDT, down 16.33%, giving back most of the earlier gains in one session. October 9 then bounced 9.44%, and October 10 added 5.14% to close at 5.133 USDT.

The lesson is that news can light a fire, but who buys after the match is struck is a different question. The October 8 candle opened at 5.333 USDT and closed at 4.462 USDT, a wide gap that shows bids briefly disappeared. NEARUSDT is a crypto USDT-margined perpetual contract listed on 2020-10-15, so liquidity is not thin, yet in a day like that perpetual holders feel far more pain than spot holders.

Where this week sits in 200 weeks

This week gained 4.48%, ranking 71st out of 200 weeks, in the first half of the sample. Seventy weeks were stronger. A few of them show the gap clearly.

Stronger week	Open	Close	Change
2026-09-14	2.297 USDT	4.166 USDT	81.37%
2023-12-18	2.268 USDT	3.803 USDT	67.68%
2026-05-18	1.507 USDT	2.394 USDT	58.86%
2025-11-03	2.189 USDT	3.073 USDT	40.38%
2024-03-11	5.955 USDT	8.25 USDT	38.54%
2023-01-09	1.646 USDT	2.242 USDT	36.21%

The week of 2026-09-14 gained 81.37%, from 2.297 USDT to 4.166 USDT, the strongest in the sample; 2023-12-18 gained 67.68%; 2026-05-18 gained 58.86%. Against those numbers, this week's 4.48% is a fraction. Ranking 71st and sitting in the first half of the sample means it beat more than half the weeks, but it is far from a week where money was chasing hard. Quantum-resistant signatures are a story that can run for years, yet between that story and a 4.48% weekly gain stand 70 stronger weeks.

What the hot posts are saying

Hot posts on the square argue that NEAR accounts supporting quantum-resistant ML-DSA signatures means the account security layer is moving toward quantum resistance, and with quantum computing discussed repeatedly, such an upgrade is treated as a long-term narrative (relayed, not the site's view).

Other posts push the topic further, saying quantum resistance is a lesson every public chain must eventually learn, NEAR moved first, and more projects will follow, so the discussion is about a position years out rather than one week's move. That sounds reasonable, but it addresses direction, not price. No hot post explains why this week rose 7.73% and then fell 16.33%; a warming narrative is not the same as sustained buying.

Three honest points

First, gaps and long red candles do not announce themselves. On October 8 the open was 5.333 USDT and the close 4.462 USDT, down 16.33%; in perpetual contracts that kind of daily drop triggers a chain of forced reductions, and by the time you read the news the move is done. Quantum-resistant signatures are a good topic, but they do not control who sells on a given day.

Second, high leverage turns a 4.48% weekly gain into something entirely different. This week went from 4.913 USDT to 5.133 USDT, which looks like a gain on spot, yet the 16.33% candle on October 8 could push a leveraged position out before the bounce. Being right on direction while being forced out is the most common outcome in weeks like this.

Third, funding rates and the idea that the best week is a conclusion in hindsight belong together. Ranking 71st and sitting in the first half of the sample is a statistic computed after the fact; when the week of 2026-09-14 gained 81.37%, nobody knew it would become the strongest in the sample. Treating a backward-looking conclusion as a forward-looking signal is how people get hurt on days like October 8.

On fees

Binance's default contract maker fee is 0.02% and the default taker fee is 0.05%. After a 20% rebate, the effective maker fee is 0.016% and the effective taker fee is 0.04%.

A week with both a 7.73% green candle and a 16.33% red candle means the more you trade in and out, the more these rates accumulate. The gap between the default tier and the post-rebate rate is right there, so short-term traders should work out their own fill mix before deciding how often to go in and out.

Source: https://fapi.binance.com/fapi/v1/exchangeInfo Data as of 2026-10-10; source: Binance official API. Not investment advice.

Related Articles

• ETH Falls 7.93% This Week: Only 29 of 200 Weeks Were Weaker
• BTC Falls 4.04% This Week: Only 38 of 200 Weeks Were Weaker
• ETH Falls 8.12% This Week: Only 27 of 200 Weeks Were Weaker